Hammorabi- an Iraqi blog
http://hammorabi.blogspot.com/
Interesting words from an Iraqi. They got technology and web access over
there thanks to US, not the UN! Especially of interest to me is the
tidbits about Iran. The real danger is Iran, not Iraq. Even though I
remain steadfast that President Bush did the right thing in plucking
Saddam out of his rathole, the whole decision to invade Iraq might have
been a mistake, because Iran HAS, no question about it, to be taken care
of, one way or other, and the final option, military, is rapifly
approaching. Ah, at least we got 135,000 troops on one side of Iran for
the anvil and 10,000 on the other for the hammer.
John Kerry just said he would STILL have voted for the war even with the
info we have today, that no WMDs have been found so far. Do you see, you
ultra-liberals? John Kerry WILL NOT withhdraw from Iraq. He WILL
continue the Bush Doctrine of preemptive action. We invaded iraq, one of
the main reasons being WMDs (contrary to what many people think, there's
a whole lot of reasons we did it), and using the exact same formula,
Iran has to be invaded. They are blatantly violating the UN's
requirements of a peaceful nuclear program, and they are harboring known
Al-Qaeda terrorists.
It is the type of Islamic fundamentalism that Iran espouses that I have
my grievances against. I am hoping that my readers are intelligent
enough to recognize that I am speaking out (as in some of my previous
posts) against Islamic fundamentalism, not the 85% of the "good"
Muslims, though I think they should take a more forceful stance toward
the reformation of these fundamentalists. (Is the only way of reform
sending them directly to Hell?)
When you think about it, your enemy cannot be defeated if you
don't/refuse to idenify WHO they are. We are afraid to label Islam as
our enemy, but it is high time we did so. Osama bin Laden declared war
on us three times, and in 1998 he had a press conference where he
formally declared war, and listed exactly why. We're in Saudi Arabia, he
wants us out. He hates our lifestyles. Ha hates our values. He wants
jews and christians out of the middle east. Fine.
We have to unambigiously declare war on Islamic fundamentalism. We have
to remove all radical Islamists from power and espouse a democratic
system in which there is no religious and sexual apartheid. The other
option is to completely withdraw from iraq, saudi arabia, and
afghanistan. We wouldn't have any problems of terrorism. Bin laden would
get what he wants. However, that would mean there has to be "repirocity"
meaning they have to allow Westerners build churches (for example it is
illegal to even hold church services in Saudi Arabia, while they
financed the construction of about 3,000 mosques here!), they have to
stop their innate sexual apartheid and systemic religious intolerance.
Isn't it ironic that they use our system of freedom to achieve just the
opposite? I cannot imagine, in America, a group of people with power
who are religious wackos (no, Bush is NO religious loony, believe me)
who segegrates people based on sex, race and religion, and rails against
other religions. In america, they would be looked on as crazies, but the
real strange thing is the Left is so pro-Muslim, while screaming at the
Right for these very things that their "allies" do.
--jason
Interesting words from an Iraqi. They got technology and web access over
there thanks to US, not the UN! Especially of interest to me is the
tidbits about Iran. The real danger is Iran, not Iraq. Even though I
remain steadfast that President Bush did the right thing in plucking
Saddam out of his rathole, the whole decision to invade Iraq might have
been a mistake, because Iran HAS, no question about it, to be taken care
of, one way or other, and the final option, military, is rapifly
approaching. Ah, at least we got 135,000 troops on one side of Iran for
the anvil and 10,000 on the other for the hammer.
John Kerry just said he would STILL have voted for the war even with the
info we have today, that no WMDs have been found so far. Do you see, you
ultra-liberals? John Kerry WILL NOT withhdraw from Iraq. He WILL
continue the Bush Doctrine of preemptive action. We invaded iraq, one of
the main reasons being WMDs (contrary to what many people think, there's
a whole lot of reasons we did it), and using the exact same formula,
Iran has to be invaded. They are blatantly violating the UN's
requirements of a peaceful nuclear program, and they are harboring known
Al-Qaeda terrorists.
It is the type of Islamic fundamentalism that Iran espouses that I have
my grievances against. I am hoping that my readers are intelligent
enough to recognize that I am speaking out (as in some of my previous
posts) against Islamic fundamentalism, not the 85% of the "good"
Muslims, though I think they should take a more forceful stance toward
the reformation of these fundamentalists. (Is the only way of reform
sending them directly to Hell?)
When you think about it, your enemy cannot be defeated if you
don't/refuse to idenify WHO they are. We are afraid to label Islam as
our enemy, but it is high time we did so. Osama bin Laden declared war
on us three times, and in 1998 he had a press conference where he
formally declared war, and listed exactly why. We're in Saudi Arabia, he
wants us out. He hates our lifestyles. Ha hates our values. He wants
jews and christians out of the middle east. Fine.
We have to unambigiously declare war on Islamic fundamentalism. We have
to remove all radical Islamists from power and espouse a democratic
system in which there is no religious and sexual apartheid. The other
option is to completely withdraw from iraq, saudi arabia, and
afghanistan. We wouldn't have any problems of terrorism. Bin laden would
get what he wants. However, that would mean there has to be "repirocity"
meaning they have to allow Westerners build churches (for example it is
illegal to even hold church services in Saudi Arabia, while they
financed the construction of about 3,000 mosques here!), they have to
stop their innate sexual apartheid and systemic religious intolerance.
Isn't it ironic that they use our system of freedom to achieve just the
opposite? I cannot imagine, in America, a group of people with power
who are religious wackos (no, Bush is NO religious loony, believe me)
who segegrates people based on sex, race and religion, and rails against
other religions. In america, they would be looked on as crazies, but the
real strange thing is the Left is so pro-Muslim, while screaming at the
Right for these very things that their "allies" do.
--jason
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home