New Soldier - by John Kerry
New Soldier - by John Kerry
Read this seditious piece of work written by our presidential candidate, John Forbes Kerry. The blatant blasphemy of the American flag on the cover is basically what the book is all about, lies and vitriol created by proven frauds.
Recall that General Vo Nguyen Giap attributed anti-war activities such as Kerry's as the main factor behind the Communist victory. After the war, he wrote, in retrospect, "if not for the disunity created by such stateside protesters, Hanoi would have ultimately surrendered."
That's exactly why the media were severely censored and restricted during World War II. Otherwise, a majority of Americans would have cried bloody murder to FDR for his wanton slaughter of 600,000 American soldiers and millions of Germans (including innocents.) But that was not the case. We beat Hitler. We lost to Mr. Vo.
In WWII, we had to literally pulverize entire cities into submission, cities such as Dresden. Back in those days we did not have JDAMS or Tomahawks. Hitler had V-2 rockets, while we had radar, the top technologies of these days. With stratofortresses, we carpet-bombed these cities day and night, with no regard to the innocent Germans.
Certainly, smart weaponry are still dumb. Shahids are probably the best weapons of all, but nonwithstanding an American battalion of kamikazes, we try our best to use technology that minimizes civilian casualties. But, smart bombs are BOMBS. Instead of tasking 1,000 planes to destroy an industrial center back then, we can just take one B-52 and unload its payload of JDAMS on the same center, achieving the same result that 1,000 planes were required for 50 years earlier.
So, I figure, if one bomb may cause five casualties (2 deaths, 3 hurt, etc), with smart bombs, if we have 1,000 innocent casualties in the Iraq war, that would probably translate to 200 errant bombs. That is probably three full B-52 payloads. Remember that we have a 1,000-1 aircraft advantage compared to WWII technology, so it would require at least 3,000 B-52 payloads' worth of innocent deaths, 200,000 bombs that missed its target rather than 200. If you take in the original figure of 5 casualties per errant bomb, (a very conservative estimate) and multiply that by 200,000, we are confronted with a staggering death toll of a million, all because of bombs that missed their mark.
Both of these bombing techniques are bloody, but I prefer the modern method with a substantial less amount of blood. Unfortunately, in these modern times, technology enable the media to act like pack foxes fighting over the actual carcasses, the innocent dead in the war today, in order to gain ratings. If not for the media, the cancers in Fallujah would have been extricated by now and these areas smoldering ruins, with the terrorists buried under the mud bricks ever so prevalent in Iraq. But, no, in this politically-correct atmosphere, the Marines were forced to pull back and the terrorists, political correctness the least of their concerns, promptly pumped bullets into the sky, thanking Allah for their victory over the infidels. Fallujah is still their stronghold.
Without the media clamoring over each other to show the most innocent dead children on TV, without Al-Jazeera showing the beheading of American contractors, the terrorists do not have an effective way to spread their propaganda. Victory will then come swiftly and decisively. Peace then beckons us.
A fission bomb packed inside a bunker-buster would probably have done the job at Tora Bora. We wouldn't have these headaches today if all the Al-Qaeda hornets were instantly atomized in their caves, once for all? Let that be a lesson learned.
Give the Fallujahese citizens 48 hours to pack it and get out. Certainly, the terrorists, the al-Zarqawi folks, would stick in their trenches. Drop a MOAB on their heads. One bomb, one target, with .011 the power of a small atomic bomb. The task of excriating the Zarqawi cancer will be instantly completed, minus the radioactivity and innocent casualties!
Read this seditious piece of work written by our presidential candidate, John Forbes Kerry. The blatant blasphemy of the American flag on the cover is basically what the book is all about, lies and vitriol created by proven frauds.
Recall that General Vo Nguyen Giap attributed anti-war activities such as Kerry's as the main factor behind the Communist victory. After the war, he wrote, in retrospect, "if not for the disunity created by such stateside protesters, Hanoi would have ultimately surrendered."
That's exactly why the media were severely censored and restricted during World War II. Otherwise, a majority of Americans would have cried bloody murder to FDR for his wanton slaughter of 600,000 American soldiers and millions of Germans (including innocents.) But that was not the case. We beat Hitler. We lost to Mr. Vo.
In WWII, we had to literally pulverize entire cities into submission, cities such as Dresden. Back in those days we did not have JDAMS or Tomahawks. Hitler had V-2 rockets, while we had radar, the top technologies of these days. With stratofortresses, we carpet-bombed these cities day and night, with no regard to the innocent Germans.
Certainly, smart weaponry are still dumb. Shahids are probably the best weapons of all, but nonwithstanding an American battalion of kamikazes, we try our best to use technology that minimizes civilian casualties. But, smart bombs are BOMBS. Instead of tasking 1,000 planes to destroy an industrial center back then, we can just take one B-52 and unload its payload of JDAMS on the same center, achieving the same result that 1,000 planes were required for 50 years earlier.
So, I figure, if one bomb may cause five casualties (2 deaths, 3 hurt, etc), with smart bombs, if we have 1,000 innocent casualties in the Iraq war, that would probably translate to 200 errant bombs. That is probably three full B-52 payloads. Remember that we have a 1,000-1 aircraft advantage compared to WWII technology, so it would require at least 3,000 B-52 payloads' worth of innocent deaths, 200,000 bombs that missed its target rather than 200. If you take in the original figure of 5 casualties per errant bomb, (a very conservative estimate) and multiply that by 200,000, we are confronted with a staggering death toll of a million, all because of bombs that missed their mark.
Both of these bombing techniques are bloody, but I prefer the modern method with a substantial less amount of blood. Unfortunately, in these modern times, technology enable the media to act like pack foxes fighting over the actual carcasses, the innocent dead in the war today, in order to gain ratings. If not for the media, the cancers in Fallujah would have been extricated by now and these areas smoldering ruins, with the terrorists buried under the mud bricks ever so prevalent in Iraq. But, no, in this politically-correct atmosphere, the Marines were forced to pull back and the terrorists, political correctness the least of their concerns, promptly pumped bullets into the sky, thanking Allah for their victory over the infidels. Fallujah is still their stronghold.
Without the media clamoring over each other to show the most innocent dead children on TV, without Al-Jazeera showing the beheading of American contractors, the terrorists do not have an effective way to spread their propaganda. Victory will then come swiftly and decisively. Peace then beckons us.
A fission bomb packed inside a bunker-buster would probably have done the job at Tora Bora. We wouldn't have these headaches today if all the Al-Qaeda hornets were instantly atomized in their caves, once for all? Let that be a lesson learned.
Give the Fallujahese citizens 48 hours to pack it and get out. Certainly, the terrorists, the al-Zarqawi folks, would stick in their trenches. Drop a MOAB on their heads. One bomb, one target, with .011 the power of a small atomic bomb. The task of excriating the Zarqawi cancer will be instantly completed, minus the radioactivity and innocent casualties!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home